TruaceTracing the truth around AITuesday, August 25, 2026
TRV-2026-0670Certified recordPeer-reviewed

The ethical challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education: A scoping review

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT have shown potential in medical education, offering personalized learning experiences. However, this integration raises ethical concerns, including privacy, autonomy, and transparency. This study employed a scoping review methodology, systematically searching relevant literature published between January 2010 and August 31, 2024, across three major databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Through rigor…

Health · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-08-06 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Large language models such as ChatGPT can provide personalized learning experiences when integrated into medical education.

Current reading — problem

Integrating AI and LLMs into medical education raises ethical concerns across privacy and data security, algorithmic bias, accountability, fairness, reliability, dependency, and patient autonomy.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0670, v1: “The ethical challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education: A scoping review.” Truvace, 2026-08-06. /record/TRV-2026-0670 (accessed at citation time). sha256 9b779e7b322fa8b6

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv19b779e7b322f

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0670 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.