Artificial Intelligence for Cervical HPV Infection and Lesion Screening: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Its Application Potential and Patient Satisfaction
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the application potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in screening and diagnosing cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and lesions, and to assess patient satisfaction with the current diagnostic and therapeutic process as well as their unmet needs. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted via the Questionnaire Star platform, and 308 valid responses were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' demogra…
In a 308-person online survey of mostly urban women with high HPV history, 73.7% said they trusted an AI preliminary screening plus physician confirmation workflow for cervical screening, with 76% believing AI could shorten result waiting times.
Among the same respondents, 70.8% cited technical reliability and 68.2% cited data privacy as top concerns about AI application for cervical screening, while 41.2% reported anxiety during result waiting and 58.1% struggled with medical terminology.
Cross-sectional online survey design with small, skewed sample limits generalizability beyond urban younger women.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation2026-07-10
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0329, v1: “Artificial Intelligence for Cervical HPV Infection and Lesion Screening: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Its Application Potential and Patient Satisfaction.” Truvace, 2026-07-20. /record/TRV-2026-0329 (accessed at citation time). sha256 7dcf38ee963954ca…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0329 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace