Navigating ethical, regulatory, and implementation barriers to AI in healthcare: pathways toward inclusive digital health in low-resource settings—a scoping review
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet its rapid adoption raises complex ethical, regulatory, and implementation challenges. This review investigates these barriers and identifies emerging strategies that support equitable and inclusive AI deployment in resource-limited settings. Methods: Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a systematic mapping of literature was conduc…
In low- and middle-income countries, AI for healthcare faces systemic barriers including contextual bias from non-representative datasets and low governance and workforce readiness.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedFrontiers in Digital Health2026-04-13
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0194, v1: “Navigating ethical, regulatory, and implementation barriers to AI in healthcare: pathways toward inclusive digital health in low-resource settings—a scoping review.” Truvace, 2026-07-13. /record/TRV-2026-0194 (accessed at citation time). sha256 db7d759ca65a3ab6…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0194 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace