68/100

Moderate evidence

Chatbot tone matters: upbeat for subjective tasks, neutral for factual ones, study finds

Study title: When emotions matter: the contextual effectiveness of emotional expressions in AI agents

Evidence type
Controlled or validated comparison
Sample
n = 587
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
Published
2 min read

Study title: When emotions matter: the contextual effectiveness of emotional expressions in AI agents

A study in the European Journal of Marketing found that whether an AI service agent should sound emotional depends on the job it is doing. Three scenario experiments with 587 participants in total showed positive emotional expressions worked better for subjective tasks, and neutral expressions worked better for objective tasks.

Read the study abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) agents’ emotional expressions (positive or neutral) interact with service task types (subjective or objective) to shape consumer service satisfaction, and explore the mediating roles of mind perception, including perceived agency and perceived experience, in this process. Design/methodology/approach This work uses four studies, including a secondary data analysis of relevant Weibo posts and three scenario experiments involving a total of 587 par…

The gain

In four studies including three scenario experiments with 587 participants, positive emotional expressions from AI service agents produced higher satisfaction on subjective tasks, while neutral expressions did so on objective tasks.

In brief

The researchers also analysed Weibo posts, which documented consumers responding differently to AI emotional expressions in subjective and objective service contexts. The authors say the results suggest firms should design AI service agents as social actors rather than purely functional tools.

The work covers only commercial service text and uses satisfaction as the single outcome, so effects on repurchase intentions or word-of-mouth remain untested.

Main points

  1. The research combined a secondary analysis of Weibo posts with three scenario experiments involving 587 participants in total.
  2. Positive emotional expressions raised satisfaction more in subjective, experiential service tasks.
  3. Neutral emotional expressions raised satisfaction more in objective, data-driven service tasks.
  4. Positive emotion worked by increasing perceived experience, meaning how much feeling the AI seemed capable of, in subjective tasks.
  5. Neutral emotion worked by strengthening perceived agency, meaning how capable the AI seemed of acting, in objective tasks.
  6. The authors advise managers to match emotional design to the type of service task.

The full story

The study tested how an AI agent's emotional expression, positive or neutral, interacts with the type of service task, subjective or objective, to shape consumer satisfaction. It began with Weibo posts, where consumers reacted differently to AI emotion depending on the service context, then moved to three scenario experiments.

The experiments showed a clear split. Positive emotion helped on subjective tasks and neutral emotion helped on objective tasks. Mediation analyses traced these effects to two separate routes: perceived experience for positive emotion and perceived agency for neutral emotion.

The authors conclude that firms can use emotional expressions to shape how consumers judge AI, but the design should align with the task. They describe the study as strong in internal validity but limited in external validity.

Sources

1 on file
  1. European Journal of Marketingdoi:10.1108/ejm-07-2025-0569
    Peer-reviewed2026-10-14

Talk it over

Four questions to start on
Who gets this benefit, and who was left out of the study or story?

Start with a question

Chatbot tone matters: upbeat for subjective tasks, neutral for factual ones, study findshttps://truvace.com/item/when-emotions-matter-the-contextual-effectiveness-of-emotional-expressions-in-ai

  1. Who gets this benefit, and who was left out of the study or story?

    The gain In four studies including three scenario experiments with 587 participants, positive emotional expressions from AI service agents produced higher satisfaction on subjective tasks, while neutral expressions did so on objective tasks.

    Answer in the thread
  2. How do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?

    The evidence This rests on a controlled comparison with a sample of 587, from European Journal of Marketing.

    Answer in the thread
  3. What does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?

    The record’s own caveat The study covers only AI communication in commercial service texts, not domains such as education and health care or the nonverbal expressions of embodied AI, and it measures only service satisfaction rather than repurchase intentions or word-of-mouth.

    Answer in the thread
  4. Have you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?

    Answer in the thread

The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.

What readers say