Truace
Subscribe

AI-assisted writing among EFL students in Oman

Source article: Integration of AI in Education Toward Future-Ready Assessments

This research examines the dual impact of artificial intelligence in education, in response to the rapid development of AI technologies. The study explores how AI can enhance learning efficiency and educational outcomes while presenting challenges to academic integrity and fundamental skills development. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study involved 44 EFL students in Oman and surveyed 102 students from various educational institutions. Researchers analyzed students’ performance in both AI-assisted and…

By the Truvace desk2 min read1 sourcePeer-reviewedTRV-2026-1842· cite & verify
Integration of AI in Education Toward Future-Ready Assessments
Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom for Secondary School Students 22 by James Rhoda. CC BY-SA 4.0 · https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
Trace impact readingContested
P 70The P score combines the specificity and measured human impact of the grounded problem claim with the strength of this Trace’s cited sources.

Both sides are scored from claims and sources, not community votes.

G 68The G score combines the specificity and measured human impact of the grounded gain claim with the strength of this Trace’s cited sources.

In brief

A mixed-methods study followed 44 English-as-a-foreign-language students in Oman as they completed both AI-assisted and traditional writing tasks, and also surveyed 102 students from different institutions. AI help was linked to markedly fewer grammatical errors, yet most students did not fully follow the task instructions.

The pattern suggests that surface-level polish from AI tools can mask weaker engagement with the content of an assignment, which matters for how schools judge student work. The abstract does not detail how the tasks were scored or whether results would hold in other settings, so the scale of the effect beyond this sample is unclear.

Main points

  1. The sample combined 44 EFL students in Oman with a survey of 102 students from various educational institutions.
  2. 91% of surveyed students reported using AI tools, while 60.4% said they needed training in ethical usage.
  3. The authors recommend clear institutional AI governance policies and assessments that focus on learning processes rather than finished products.
  4. They also call for strengthening academic values and transparency alongside innovation.

The gain

In a study of EFL students in Oman, AI-assisted writing tasks showed a 42% reduction in grammatical errors compared with the study's traditional writing comparison.

The problem

Despite fewer grammar errors, 63% of students in the same writing tasks failed to fully follow instructions, which the authors read as limited deep content understanding.

The rundown

The research frames AI in education as having a dual impact: it can improve learning efficiency and outcomes while challenging academic integrity and the development of fundamental skills. Researchers compared performance on AI-assisted and traditional writing tasks and also observed behavior and attitudes toward the tools.

Survey results showed widespread adoption, with 91% of students using AI tools, alongside a majority-level demand for guidance, as 60.4% wanted ethical-use training. This points to a gap between how quickly students adopt the tools and how much support they have.

The study concludes with three recommendations: develop institutional AI governance policies, redesign assessment toward learning processes, and reinforce academic values and transparency. The authors describe these as balancing innovation with adaptation to technological change.

What this doesn’t fix

The evidence comes from a relatively small sample of 44 EFL students in Oman plus a 102-student survey, so findings may not generalize to other learners or contexts.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewedInternational Journal of Teacher Education Research Studies (IJTERS)2026-10-17

The debate