Public attention
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
AI company impact profile
Loading company impact history and evidence.
AI company impact profile
Llama models and assistant features distributed across Meta’s global platforms.
Rank #7 · Emerging observable footprint
Falling attention
Data effective Sep 1, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC · recomputed Sep 2, 2026, 2:14 PM UTC
How to read 35
The score normalizes public attention, official developer activity, evidence-backed gains, evidence-backed problems, and source breadth across the measured company set.
It does not mean: that Meta AI is the “best,” safest, most valuable, or most responsible company. Documented problems contribute to visible footprint rather than being hidden as a negative subtraction.
Read the complete methodology →Normalized components
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
stars and public repositories in the company’s official GitHub organization
independent stored sources attached to company-linked gain readings
independent stored sources attached to company-linked problem readings
unique independent sources in the published Truvace record
Observed history
Fixed 0–100 scale
Lines connect observed snapshots only. Gaps do not mean a score stayed unchanged. Diamond markers indicate a methodology-version transition.
| Effective date | Meta AI |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v1 |
| Jul 19, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 · method changed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 41 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | 41 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 26, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 30, 2026 | 57 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 37 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 2, 2026 | 36 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 36 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 4, 2026 | 35 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 9, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 16, 2026 | 63 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 18, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 31 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 23, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | 56 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 25, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 27, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 30, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | 35 · visible-impact-v2 |
No interpolation
| Effective | Score | Rank | Gain | Problem | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 35 (+1) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 31, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (0) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 30, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (0) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (0) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (0) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (0) | #7 (0) | 42 | 42 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 34 (+1) | #7 (0) | 42 | 43 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 25, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 33 (-23) | #7 (0) | 42 | 43 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 56 (+24) | #7 (0) | 42 | 43 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 23, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 32 (+1) | #7 (0) | 38 | 38 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 22, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 31 (-1) | #7 (0) | 38 | 38 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 21, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 32 (0) | #7 (0) | 38 | 39 | visible-impact-v2 |
Evidence profile
Downstream uses of open weights and engagement quality inside Meta apps remain hard to measure.
Linked to the record
Claims are sorted by their existing Sourced Index impact score. Each card links to its Truvace record and original sources; company marketing is not treated as independent proof.
5 gain · 5 problem · 0 high-evidence
Researchers compared human-authored short stories with stories generated by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama 70b in response to the same prompts, using Burrows' Delta and clustering methods including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to visualize stylistic relationships.
Aug 25, 2026
Researchers compared human-authored short stories with stories generated by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama 70b in response to the same prompts, using Burrows' Delta and clustering methods including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to visualize stylistic relationships.
Aug 25, 2026
As of August 4, 2024, this peer-reviewed survey in Sensors reviewed early trends in using large language models such as GPT-4 and Llama to model vast wearable sensor data for human activity recognition, health monitoring, and behavioral modeling, integrating them with time series and deep learning methods.
Jul 20, 2026
As of August 4, 2024, this peer-reviewed survey in Sensors reviewed early trends in using large language models such as GPT-4 and Llama to model vast wearable sensor data for human activity recognition, health monitoring, and behavioral modeling, integrating them with time series and deep learning methods.
Jul 20, 2026
Recorded changes