Public attention
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
AI company impact profile
Loading company impact history and evidence.
AI company impact profile
Llama models and assistant features distributed across Meta’s global platforms.
Rank #7 · Emerging observable footprint
Rising attention
Data effective Oct 16, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC · recomputed Oct 17, 2026, 2:18 PM UTC
How to read 29
The score normalizes public attention, official developer activity, evidence-backed gains, evidence-backed problems, and source breadth across the measured company set.
It does not mean: that Meta AI is the “best,” safest, most valuable, or most responsible company. Documented problems contribute to visible footprint rather than being hidden as a negative subtraction.
Read the complete methodology →Normalized components
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
stars and public repositories in the company’s official GitHub organization
independent stored sources attached to company-linked gain readings
independent stored sources attached to company-linked problem readings
unique independent sources in the published Truvace record
Observed history
Fixed 0–100 scale
Lines connect observed snapshots only. Gaps do not mean a score stayed unchanged. Diamond markers indicate a methodology-version transition.
| Effective date | Meta AI |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v1 |
| Jul 19, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 · method changed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 41 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | 41 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 26, 2026 | 40 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | 39 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 30, 2026 | 57 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 38 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 37 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 2, 2026 | 36 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 36 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 4, 2026 | 35 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 9, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 16, 2026 | 63 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | 55 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 18, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 31 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 23, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | 56 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 25, 2026 | 33 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 27, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 30, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | 35 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 3, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 4, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 6, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 7, 2026 | 34 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 8, 2026 | 56 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 9, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 11, 2026 | 32 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 31 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 13, 2026 | 31 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 14, 2026 | 54 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 15, 2026 | 31 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 16, 2026 | 29 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 17, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 20, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 21, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | 28 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 23, 2026 | 28 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 24, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 25, 2026 | 50 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 27, 2026 | 25 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 28, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 29, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Sep 30, 2026 | 24 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 1, 2026 | 50 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 2, 2026 | 51 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 51 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 4, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 5, 2026 | 52 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 6, 2026 | 52 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 7, 2026 | 52 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 8, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 26 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 11, 2026 | 53 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 13, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 14, 2026 | 27 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 28 · visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 29 · visible-impact-v2 |
No interpolation
| Effective | Score | Rank | Gain | Problem | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 29 (+1) | #7 (0) | 39 | 35 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 15, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 28 (+1) | #7 (0) | 32 | 32 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 14, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 27 (0) | #7 (0) | 33 | 31 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 13, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 27 (0) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 12, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 27 (-26) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 11, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 53 (+27) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 10, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 26 (0) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 9, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 26 (0) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 26 (-26) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 7, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 52 (0) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 6, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 52 (0) | #7 (0) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
| Oct 5, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 52 (+26) | #7 (+1) | 44 | 24 | visible-impact-v2 |
Evidence profile
Downstream uses of open weights and engagement quality inside Meta apps remain hard to measure.
Linked to the record
Claims are sorted by their existing Sourced Index impact score. Each card links to its Truvace record and original sources; company marketing is not treated as independent proof.
10 gain · 12 problem · 0 high-evidence
Researchers used more than 295 million inpatient audit log actions recorded between 2019 and 2024 to fine-tune Llama-3-8B to predict a clinician's next action in the electronic health record. They compared two encodings, symbolic field-based tokens and word-based natural-language descriptions, against a first-order Markov baseline.
Oct 15, 2026
Researchers tested four language models, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Meta Llama 3 70B, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B, on official text-only USMLE sample questions from Steps 1, 2 CK, and 3. Each model was run with and without SCAI, a semantic knowledge system that supplies clinical context to the host model. Three of the four models improved significantly, while Copilot barely changed.
Oct 17, 2026
Researchers built a scoring rubric to test how accurately four widely used large language models answered harm reduction questions. The questions covered filtering oral medications before injection and finding local harm reduction services. Gemini 2.5 Flash scored 87% and ChatGPT-4o 77%, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 3.3 70B scored 22% and Llama 4 scored 18%.
Oct 16, 2026
Researchers built a scoring rubric to test how accurately four widely used large language models answered harm reduction questions. The questions covered filtering oral medications before injection and finding local harm reduction services. Gemini 2.5 Flash scored 87% and ChatGPT-4o 77%, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 3.3 70B scored 22% and Llama 4 scored 18%.
Oct 16, 2026
Researchers compared six language models on common pre-analytical questions in medical microbiology, using OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, Meta's Llama2-7B and Llama2-13B, and two domain-enhanced versions. Outputs were checked against expert-reviewed reference answers and scored by thirty-three medical professionals.
Oct 14, 2026
Researchers built a two-stage large language model pipeline to turn free-text clinical notes into structured symptom severity data for vagus nerve stimulation patients, part of NIH-funded work U54AT012307. Using 1427 annotated notes from 95 patients, LLaMA models classified symptoms and then graded severity, producing quarterly trajectories for 23 VNS patients compared to a 10-patient NSQIP surgical control.
Oct 3, 2026
Researchers compared human-authored short stories with stories generated by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama 70b in response to the same prompts, using Burrows' Delta and clustering methods including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to visualize stylistic relationships.
Aug 25, 2026
Researchers compared human-authored short stories with stories generated by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama 70b in response to the same prompts, using Burrows' Delta and clustering methods including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to visualize stylistic relationships.
Aug 25, 2026
As of August 4, 2024, this peer-reviewed survey in Sensors reviewed early trends in using large language models such as GPT-4 and Llama to model vast wearable sensor data for human activity recognition, health monitoring, and behavioral modeling, integrating them with time series and deep learning methods.
Jul 20, 2026
As of August 4, 2024, this peer-reviewed survey in Sensors reviewed early trends in using large language models such as GPT-4 and Llama to model vast wearable sensor data for human activity recognition, health monitoring, and behavioral modeling, integrating them with time series and deep learning methods.
Jul 20, 2026
Recorded changes